ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
HS-GC/MS-Based Targeted Blood VOC Panel for Canine Cancer Screening Using an Integrated Classification Framework in Retrospective Korea and Thailand Cohorts.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Canine cancer screening has an important limitation in that organ-specific screening strategies used in human medicine cannot be directly applied across routine veterinary clinical practice. Blood-based volatile organic compound (VOC) profiling may provide a practical approach for pan-cancer screening; however, its application in multicenter and multinational settings requires evaluation that accounts for cohort heterogeneity and analytical variability. In this study, we evaluated the canine cancer screening performance of an integrated classification framework using a headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC/MS)-based targeted blood VOC panel in a retrospective multicohort dataset comprising dogs recruited in Korea and Thailand. Whole-blood samples from 590 dogs recruited in Korea and Thailand were analyzed, including 167 dogs in the malignant tumor group and 423 dogs in the non-cancer control group. The predefined targeted VOC panel consisted of aromatic compounds and straight-chain alkanes and was analyzed using HS-GC/MS. The Korea and Thailand cohorts were incorporated into a single integrated classification framework rather than being separated into country-specific models. To evaluate performance variability associated with data partitioning, cohort-aware stratified training-validation splitting was repeated 30 times within the integrated retrospective cohort, with both national cohorts represented in the training and validation sets in each repeat. Class imbalance correction was applied only to the training data, and validation performance was assessed using both threshold-dependent and threshold-independent metrics. Across the 30 repeated validations, the integrated framework achieved an AUROC of 0.926 ± 0.019 and an AUPRC of 0.894 ± 0.023. Balanced accuracy, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, MCC, and Cohen's κ were 0.858 ± 0.024, 0.895 ± 0.018, 0.772 ± 0.048, 0.943 ± 0.022, 0.805 ± 0.033, 0.736 ± 0.046, and 0.734 ± 0.045, respectively. In the sample-level prediction score analysis, the median predicted cancer probabilities for cancer and non-cancer samples were 0.954 and 0.041, respectively, indicating clear probability-based separation between the two groups. In the cohort-specific analysis, the discrimination signal was maintained in both the Korea and Thailand cohorts, although threshold-dependent performance differed between the two cohorts. These findings indicate that an HS-GC/MS-based targeted blood VOC panel provided a consistent cancer-associated classification signal under repeated internal validation within the specific integrated retrospective dataset evaluated in this study. The results demonstrate the feasibility of evaluating a common classification framework across the Korea and Thailand cohorts without constructing separate country-specific models, while not establishing independent external generalizability or platform-independent robustness. Because the Korea and Thailand cohorts were completely confounded with the Agilent and Thermo Fisher analytical platforms, respectively, the independent contributions of cohort characteristics and analytical platform cannot be determined from the present data. Further independent prospective validation in newly recruited populations and institutions, together with disease-control evaluation including clinically relevant controls, cohort-specific calibration, evaluation across analytical platforms, and assessment of clinical utility within real-world workflows, is required before the external generalizability and clinical applicability of the framework can be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.