Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794410›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Promises and Perspectives of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Companion and Farm Animals.

Thirumala Rao Talluri, Pradeep Nag, Narendra Singh Rathore, Wilfried A Kues, Dharmendra Kumar, Naresh Selokar, Kamlesh Kumari Bajwa, Mohd Matin Ansari, T K Bhattacharya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thirumala Rao TalluriEquine Production Campus, ICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner 334001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4012-3545
Pradeep NagSouthern Regional Station of ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Bengaluru 560030, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-5506
Narendra Singh RathoreCollege of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Rajasthan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bikaner 334001, India.
Wilfried A KuesFriedrich Loeffler Institute, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Biotechnology/Stem Cell Physiology, 31535 Neustadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0850-8103
Dharmendra KumarICAR-Central Institute for Research on Buffaloes, Hisar 125001, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-8960
Naresh SelokarICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India.
Kamlesh Kumari BajwaICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India.ORCID 0009-0008-0638-3993
Mohd Matin AnsariICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Bikaner 334001, India.
T K BhattacharyaEquine Production Campus, ICAR-National Research Centre on Equines, Bikaner 334001, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4502-1852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are heterogeneous, multipotent cell populations that have become one of the most extensively investigated cell types in veterinary regenerative medicine. They can be isolated from a wide range of adult and perinatal tissues and have attracted considerable interest because of their immunomodulatory properties, broad secretory activity, and potential to promote tissue repair. However, increasing evidence indicates that MSCs should not be regarded as a uniform therapeutic product, as their biological behaviour is influenced by tissue source, donor characteristics, manufacturing conditions, and the recipient microenvironment. Likewise, their therapeutic effects are now understood to arise predominantly through dynamic interactions with the host, including inflammatory licensing, immunomodulation, secreted bioactive factors, extracellular vesicles, metabolic exchange, and responses to apoptotic cells, rather than through durable engraftment and direct tissue replacement alone. Although clinical evidence supports the use of selected MSC products in canine osteoarthritis and suggests promise for equine musculoskeletal disorders, most other veterinary applications remain preclinical or investigational. This review critically examines current knowledge of MSC biological identity, tissue-source diversity, molecular mechanisms, therapeutic applications, and comparative translational roles in companion and farm animals. It also discusses the challenges that continue to limit clinical translation, including biological heterogeneity, product characterization, potency assessment, manufacturing standardization, and regulatory considerations, and highlights future directions for the development of safe, effective, and evidence-based MSC therapies in veterinary medicine.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationPetsAnimalsCattleDogsHorsesHumansRegenerative Medicinebiomoleculebuffalocattlecompanion animalhorselivestockmesenchymal stem cellmesenchymal stromal cellregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID42794410
PMCPMC13606146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.