ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Injectable Hydroxyapatite-Reinforced Methacrylated Recombinant Type III Collagen Microgels for Soft-Tissue Filling.
Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Injectable fillers that combine immediate volume restoration with a sustained biological response remain of considerable interest in minimally invasive aesthetic medicine. In this study, a hydroxyapatite-loaded methacrylated recombinant type III collagen microgel (HAp@rhCol III-MA) was prepared by in situ coprecipitation and photocrosslinking. Recombinant type III collagen (rhCol III) was functionalized with methacryloyl groups to obtain rhCol III-MA, after which a calcium phosphate phase was mineralized in the presence of the modified collagen and the collagen phase was crosslinked under ultraviolet irradiation. More than 80% of the microgel particles prepared at 900 rpm were 20-80 μm in diameter. Spectroscopic, elemental, thermal, and diffraction analyses supported the incorporation of a poorly crystalline, HAp-compatible calcium phosphate phase, while rheological measurements showed higher storage and loss moduli than those of rhCol III-MA gel. HAp@rhCol III-MA did not reduce NIH-3T3 cell viability at the tested concentrations and enhanced HUVEC scratch closure and tube-network formation in vitro. Following subcutaneous implantation in rats, the microgel retained more volume than rhCol III-MA during the early and intermediate observation periods, with residual volumes of 56.58 ± 3.03 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.