Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794306›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sustainable Co-Extraction of Starch and Tannins from

Luís M G Castro, Carlos A Pinto, Sérgio C Sousa, Elisabete M C Alexandre, Jorge A Saraiva, Manuela Pintado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luís M G CastroCBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Carlos A PintoLAQV-REQUIMTE-Laboratório Associado, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-706X
Sérgio C SousaCBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Elisabete M C AlexandreCBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4175-2498
Jorge A SaraivaLAQV-REQUIMTE-Laboratório Associado, Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-6056
Manuela PintadoCBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0760-3184

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/136038/2018Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/136882/2018Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50006/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/Multi/50016/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed electric field (PEF) technology was used as a green extraction method for the simultaneous recovery of starch and polyphenols from acorns using water as extraction solvent, and the gelatinization properties of the extracted starch were compared with those of a starch obtained via alkaline extraction. Results showed that the electric field intensity had a significant negative quadratic effect on the antioxidant activity and hydrolyzable tannin content, whereas it had a positive quadratic effect on the starch yields. Time had no significant effect on the starch yields but had a negative quadratic effect on the phenolic and hydrolyzable tannin contents and antioxidant activity. The extraction condition that allowed the highest starch and polyphenol contents with the greatest antioxidant activity was 0.1 kV/cm for 63.3 µs, with a desirability of 87%. In comparison to alkaline extraction, PEF increased tannin extraction by 11-fold, highlighting its potential to produce tannin-rich extracts suitable for leather manufacture. Although the starch yield was 30% lower than that obtained via alkaline extraction, the PEF-isolated starch is a cleaner and safer ingredient for human consumption. The alkaline starch had a significantly higher solubility than the PEF-isolated starch, but both had similar swelling power.

Indexed as

gelatinization propertiespulsed electric fieldQuercus spp.starch extractiontannin recovery

Identifiers

PMID42794306
PMCPMC13606572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.