Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794287›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Comprehensive Review of the Approach to Ultrasonography in Neonatal Shock: The Partnership Between Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography and Point-of-Care Ultrasound.

Nina Nouraeyan, Kimberly Wong, Ashraf Kharrat, María V Fraga, Gabriel Altit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina NouraeyanDivision of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Kimberly WongDivision of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3H9, Canada.
Ashraf KharratDepartment of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.
María V FragaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Gabriel AltitDivision of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4A 3H9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-0964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neonatal cardiovascular system is dynamic and influenced by multiple factors, which makes neonatal shock a challenging early clinical diagnosis. Real-time monitoring has been limited to indirect measurements of hemodynamic well-being, such as heart rate, blood pressure, capillary refill time, and biochemical markers of adequate oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption. Bedside diagnostic ultrasound to guide decision-making has become increasingly integrated into modern neonatal care. It allows clinicians to enhance physiologic monitoring, differentiate among diverse cardiovascular phenotypes, including time-critical conditions such as tamponade, that may present with similar clinical signs, and interpret complex, evolving physiology in real time. By providing this additional layer of physiologic insight, it may enable more precise, individualized management, with potential implications for fluid administration, vasoactive support, and ventilatory strategies. Among neonatologists who incorporate bedside imaging into clinical practice, some rely on focused point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) skills, while others have formal training in targeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE). This review outlines the distinct but complementary roles of POCUS and TNE, highlighting the specific diagnostic questions each can address, as well as their respective limitations in the evaluation of neonatal shock. Broadly, POCUS is designed to rapidly identify causes of clinical deterioration through focused lung, cardiac, abdominal, and cranial assessments. In contrast, TNE provides a more comprehensive and longitudinal evaluation of cardiovascular function guiding management over time. Differences in training pathways may create a perceived dichotomy between POCUS and TNE; however, these modalities are inherently complementary and should be integrated in the care of critically ill infants. Ultimately, the neonate must be assessed holistically, with ultrasound serving to augment-rather than replace-clinical judgment within the broader clinical context. A clear understanding of the interdependent roles of POCUS and TNE is essential to enable timely, meaningful, and integrated use of bedside ultrasound in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Indexed as

neonatal shockpoint-of-care ultrasoundtargeted neonatal echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID42794287
PMCPMC13604964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.