ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hemodynamic Phenotypes in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Unresolved Questions and Future Directions.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is increasingly recognized as a dynamic cardiopulmonary disease in which pulmonary hypoplasia, pulmonary hypertension, and cardiac dysfunction interact to shape clinical instability, therapeutic response, and outcomes. Hemodynamic phenotyping has emerged as a strategy to move beyond binary classification of pulmonary hypertension and toward physiology-directed care. Early single-center experiences suggest potential clinical utility of echocardiography-guided, phenotype-directed management; however, external validation remains limited. Further important challenges remain, including technical and institutional barriers to timely echocardiography, limitations of static single-time-point assessments, uncertainty regarding what exactly defines each phenotype, and incomplete understanding of the impact of time and therapies on phenotype presentations. In this perspective, we summarize the evolution of heart-focused care in CDH, describe current hemodynamic phenotyping approaches, examine unresolved questions in phenotype classification and implementation, and outline future research priorities needed to advance dynamic, mechanism-based precision cardiopulmonary care for infants with CDH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.