Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794132›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Postharvest Management of Fruits: Navigating the Affordability, Efficacy, and Non-Destructive Quality Evaluation of Thermal Versus Non-Thermal Interventions.

Kishenthi Kerisnan, Kivaandra Dayaa Rao Ramarao, Sze-Looi Song, Chandran Somasundram, Zuliana Razali, Sarmila Muthukrishan, Saiful Irwan Zubairi, Mohammed Wasim Siddiqui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kishenthi KerisnanInstitute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Kivaandra Dayaa Rao RamaraoInstitute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0006-5742-1940
Sze-Looi SongInstitute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1188-9728
Chandran SomasundramInstitute for Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Zuliana RazaliInstitute for Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-835X
Sarmila MuthukrishanDepartment of Science and Technology Studies, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8868-0298
Saiful Irwan ZubairiDepartment of Food Sciences, Faculty of Science & Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1674-9820
Mohammed Wasim SiddiquiIndian Institute of Packaging, Plot E-2, MIDC Area, Cross Road B, Road No. 8, Andheri East, Mumbai 400093, India.

Funding

University of Malaya UMREG023-2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postharvest losses (PHLs) present a critical bottleneck to global food security, with fresh fruit losses reaching 23-40% due to rapid physiological deterioration, mechanical stress, and microbial decay. This review evaluates the metabolic cascades, including respiration kinetics, transpiration, and hormone-mediated factors, that govern fruit degradation. We reviewed thermal and non-thermal treatments for affordability, including thermal interventions such as hot water treatment (HWT), microwave treatment, and radio frequency treatment, alongside emerging non-thermal preservation modalities such as edible coatings, cold plasma atmospheric treatments, and ultrasound processing. The review places particular emphasis on climacteric tropical fruits such as mango, papaya, banana, and citrus, for which postharvest losses and preservation challenges are especially acute due to their climacteric nature. To address the quality tracking highlighted by modern commercial chains, this review integrates an assessment of non-destructive quality evaluation technologies, focusing on near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and electronic noses (E-noses). Overall, this review seeks to deliver a unified blueprint, arguing that sustainable postharvest preservation can benefit from context-specific hurdle-technology concepts that align accessible postharvest treatments with monitoring networks. We synthesise current evidence on individual thermal, non-thermal, and sensing technologies and use this to motivate potential hurdle strategies and treatment-monitoring pairings for diverse fruit supply chains.

Indexed as

economic affordabilityfruit qualitynon-thermal preservation technologiespostharvest preservationthermal preservation technologies

Identifiers

PMID42794132
PMCPMC13606648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.