Comparative Study on Taste and Odor Flavor Compounds of Chrysanthemums from Five Different Varieties Using UPLC-Q-TOF-MS, GC-MS, E-Tongue, E-Nose, and Chemometrics.

Guizhou Hu, Xinqi Li, Geng Qin, Ailing Ben, Jin Qi

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guizhou HuSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.

Xinqi LiSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6634-0778

Geng QinSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.

Ailing BenNanjing Key Laboratory of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Products, College of Food Science, Nanjing XiaoZhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China.

Jin QiSchool of Traditional Chinese Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A practical strategy was established for distinguishing five varieties of Chrysanthemums by combining E-tongue, E-nose, GC-MS, and LC-Q-TOF-MS. A total of 19 low molecule fraction compounds and 26 volatile fraction compounds were identified as the common peaks. Chemometrics were used to screen the characteristic compounds of the five varieties of Chrysanthemums. E-tongue and E-nose were used to distinguish the taste and odor of the five varieties of Chrysanthemum, respectively. The Hangju variety had the richest taste flavor and the weakest aroma, while the Huaiju variety had the strongest odor of pine, woody, floral, and fruity aroma. The study found that 3, 5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 1, 5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, luteolin-7-

Indexed as

chemometricsChrysanthemumsE-noseE-tongueGC-MSUPLC-Q-TOF-MS

Identifiers

PMID42794112

DOI10.3390/foods15183328

PMCPMC13606529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.