ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Postharvest Fruit Grading Technologies and Equipment: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Postharvest fruit quality differs among various fruits and alters during sorting, packaging, transportation and storage. Therefore, it is important to have an efficient and objective grading method that causes little mechanical damage to ensure the uniformity of products and decrease market price and losses in the supply chain. This paper describes the grading norms, detection techniques, processing algorithms, structural designs and practical uses in different types of fruits. It examines the external features, internal quality and hidden faults by using machine vision, visible-near-infrared spectroscopy, hyperspectral and X-ray imaging, acoustic and mechanical detection, electronic noses and the integration of multiple sensors. In addition, it also investigates conventional machine learning, deep learning, transfer learning and lightweight implementations. The research has developed from grading according to size, weight and color to a complete evaluation of ripeness, juice volume, hardness, internal defects and shelf life. Moreover, single detection devices are joined together to construct integrated systems including feeding, separation, inspection, classification, redirection, packaging and data management. However, the application is restricted by the discrepancy between the grading criteria and measurable results, the lack of cross-species and batch generalization ability, and the difficulty in coordinating multiple sensors in real time. The systems should maintain a balance between production speed, mechanical damage and costs. Some matters needing attention are to standardize the quality description, choose multi-source fusion, develop adaptive lightweight models, design modular structures and guarantee end-to-end traceability. Solving these problems will facilitate the transition from accurate laboratory identification to reliable, economic and extensive commercial grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.