Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794058›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advances in Sensing Techniques and Deep Learning for Food Quality Detection: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives from Image Recognition to Multimodal Data Fusion.

Weihao Wang, Zhidan Jiang, Sisi Yang, Zhou Qin, Yongqiang Shi, Yaodi Zhu, Zhiyuan Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weihao WangAgricultural Product Processing and Storage Lab, School of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Zhidan JiangAgricultural Product Processing and Storage Lab, School of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Sisi YangAgricultural Product Processing and Storage Lab, School of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0009-0009-7002-6269
Zhou QinAgricultural Product Processing and Storage Lab, School of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Yongqiang ShiAgricultural Product Processing and Storage Lab, School of Food Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-1309
Yaodi ZhuCollege of Food Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Zhiyuan SunHenan Institute of Food and Salt Industry Inspection Technology, Zhengzhou 450003, China.

Funding

Henan Science and Technology Department 251111114000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food quality and safety inspection increasingly requires advanced solutions because conventional methods are challenged by the complexity of modern food systems. Effective inspection must address product quality, authenticity, and safety, together with process-related risks arising during production, storage, transportation, and distribution. However, existing analytical approaches and deep learning studies often focus on individual food attributes or sensing modalities, providing limited guidance for selecting appropriate models and sensing strategies for specific inspection objectives. This review systematically compares CNNs, RNNs/LSTMs, Transformers, GNNs, GANs, and hybrid architectures, as well as transfer learning, self-supervised learning, contrastive learning, few-shot learning, lightweight networks, edge computing, and multimodal fusion. Beyond predictive performance, we evaluate dataset size and representativeness, sample- and batch-level validation, external validation, data-leakage risks, interpretability, computational requirements, and the maturity of food-specific evidence. The principal contribution is an application-oriented framework linking inspection objectives and food matrices with sensing modalities, model architectures, validation evidence, and deployment conditions. Although Transformer-, GNN-, GAN-, multimodal-, and few-shot-learning-based approaches show substantial potential, many remain at developing, emerging, or prototype stages in food-specific applications. For high-risk targets, including toxicants, allergens, adulterants, and foodborne pathogens, deep learning systems should primarily support rapid screening and decision-making, while safety-critical results require confirmation using validated reference methods. Overall, this review provides a systematic perspective on deep learning for food quality and safety inspection and identifies key priorities for future research and industrial deployment.

Indexed as

deep learningfood quality detectionimage recognitionmodel optimizationmultimodal data fusion

Identifiers

PMID42794058
PMCPMC13606374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.