ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Smart Consumption, Less Waste: The Role of Digital Technologies in Consumer Food Waste Reduction-A Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital technologies are increasingly used to understand and influence consumer food waste behavior, yet evidence on their applications and effectiveness remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesizes research at the intersection of consumer behavior, technological innovation, and food waste. Peer-reviewed articles published in English were identified through searches of Scopus and Web of Science, resulting in a final sample of 22 studies. Thematic analyses were conducted to examine publication patterns, research contexts, methodological approaches, and emerging research gaps. The literature shows a shift from predominantly theoretical and exploratory work towards more applied, technology-centered research. Scientific production is concentrated in Australia, China, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, while the selected studies are mainly published in journals focused on environmental sustainability, food-chain management, and consumer psychology. Two broad research approaches were identified: quantitative studies using cross-sectional surveys and statistical modeling, in which technology is treated as an explanatory factor, and experimental or design-oriented studies that employ technology as a direct intervention. However, the evidence base is constrained by extensive reliance on self-reported data, recall and social-desirability bias, and cross-sectional designs that limit causal and long-term conclusions. Future research should therefore prioritize longitudinal, mixed-methods, and objective measurement approaches, while examining emotional and psychological responses to food-waste-prevention technologies. The implementation of such technologies also requires attention to usability, user fatigue, privacy and ethical concerns, and psychological and cultural barriers to adoption. Overall, the findings indicate that digital technologies offer promising but insufficiently validated opportunities to support food waste reduction and that stronger empirical evidence is needed to guide their effective and responsible development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.