Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42794013›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Smart Consumption, Less Waste: The Role of Digital Technologies in Consumer Food Waste Reduction-A Systematic Literature Review.

Paula Karina Salume, Marcelo Werneck Barbosa, Marcelo de Rezende Pinto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paula Karina SalumeDepartamento de Ciências Administrativas e Contábeis (DECAC), Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei (UFSJ), Av. Visconde do Rio Preto, S/n, bairro Colônia do Bengo, São João del Rei 36301-360, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-9608
Marcelo Werneck BarbosaDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Vicuña Mackenna 4860, Macul, Santiago 7820436, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-5375
Marcelo de Rezende PintoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Administração, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais (PUC Minas), Av. Dom José Gaspar, 500, Coração Eucarístico, Belo Horizonte 30535-901, MG, Brazil.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 407904/2025-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital technologies are increasingly used to understand and influence consumer food waste behavior, yet evidence on their applications and effectiveness remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesizes research at the intersection of consumer behavior, technological innovation, and food waste. Peer-reviewed articles published in English were identified through searches of Scopus and Web of Science, resulting in a final sample of 22 studies. Thematic analyses were conducted to examine publication patterns, research contexts, methodological approaches, and emerging research gaps. The literature shows a shift from predominantly theoretical and exploratory work towards more applied, technology-centered research. Scientific production is concentrated in Australia, China, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, while the selected studies are mainly published in journals focused on environmental sustainability, food-chain management, and consumer psychology. Two broad research approaches were identified: quantitative studies using cross-sectional surveys and statistical modeling, in which technology is treated as an explanatory factor, and experimental or design-oriented studies that employ technology as a direct intervention. However, the evidence base is constrained by extensive reliance on self-reported data, recall and social-desirability bias, and cross-sectional designs that limit causal and long-term conclusions. Future research should therefore prioritize longitudinal, mixed-methods, and objective measurement approaches, while examining emotional and psychological responses to food-waste-prevention technologies. The implementation of such technologies also requires attention to usability, user fatigue, privacy and ethical concerns, and psychological and cultural barriers to adoption. Overall, the findings indicate that digital technologies offer promising but insufficiently validated opportunities to support food waste reduction and that stronger empirical evidence is needed to guide their effective and responsible development.

Indexed as

consumer behavior changefood waste preventionsustainable consumptionsystematic literature reviewtechnology adoption barrierstechnology-driven interventions

Identifiers

PMID42794013
PMCPMC13606489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.