ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Process Simulation and Comparative Techno-Economic Assessment of Fish Oil Recovery from Fish Heads via Supercritical CO
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The valorization of fish processing by-products, particularly fish heads, represents an opportunity to advance the circular economy and reduce the environmental burden associated with organic waste. This study presents a process simulation-based techno-economic assessment of industrial-scale oil extraction from fish heads using supercritical fluid extraction (SCFE) and enzymatic hydrolysis extraction (EHE). Process models were developed in SuperPro Designer (V9.0) for a 50,000 kg/batch facility, integrating mass and energy balances, equipment design, scheduling, and economic analysis. All the results are derived from process simulations and have not been validated experimentally. SCFE yields a relatively high annual oil output (43.03 million kg/year) but is constrained by high solvent costs. EHE produces less oil (34.06 million kg/year) yet shows superior economic indicators, including a higher return on investment (24.77%), a shorter payback period (4.04 years), and diversified co-product revenues (cake, lecithin, soapstock), although it requires relatively greater capital ($862.7 million compared with $846.2 million for SCFE). While a full life-cycle assessment was not conducted, a partial resource inventory assessment indicates that EHE enables a biorefinery approach that improves resource efficiency. A sensitivity analysis revealed that the most favorable batch capacities were 50,000 kg for the SCFE and 150,000 kg for the EHE under the assumptions and throughput range examined. Overall, this simulation-based study underscores the economic and resource-efficiency potential of integrated biorefinery strategies for fish waste valorization, while highlighting the need for experimental validation and comprehensive environmental evaluation in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.