ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Detecting Unseen IoT Attacks with Calibrated Dual Evidence Under Low False-Positive Budget.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) traffic anomaly detection is essential for limiting device compromise and large-scale attacks. Existing detectors may miss attack families absent from model development, while heterogeneous benign traffic makes it difficult to maintain a low false-positive rate (FPR). To address these two practical limitations, we propose the Mode-Calibrated Dual-Evidence Detector (MCDE). Its supervised branch estimates the probability that a sample is malicious from labeled benign and known-attack traffic, while its benign-deviation branch measures distance from multiple learned benign traffic modes, providing a complementary route for unseen attacks. MCDE maps the heterogeneous probability and distance scores to comparable empirical benign-tail evidence, normalizes each branch by its allocated share of the target FPR, and fuses them into an anomaly score. A disjoint held-out benign set determines the decision threshold. Equivalently, the fusion compares budget-adjusted benign-tail surprisal, linking the decision rule to empirical self-information. We further establish the conditions under which the budgeted fusion controls the nominal overall FPR. Family-hold-out experiments on IoT-23 and N-BaIoT validate MCDE. At a 1% target benign FPR, MCDE improves IoT-23 unseen recall over histogram-based gradient boosting from 85.77% to 90.85% and harmonic known-unseen recall from 91.82% to 95.07%, while maintaining a 0.96% benign-test FPR. It also achieves 99.87% unseen recall on N-BaIoT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.