ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Uncertainty-Calibrated Collaborative Filtering via Heteroscedastic Bayesian Neural Networks.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although recommendation systems based on neural collaborative filtering (NCF) can achieve high rating accuracy, the point estimates they generate do not express prediction confidence. Existing variants that account for uncertainty, such as Monte Carlo dropout, deep ensemble models, and single-head Bayesian networks, can only capture epistemic uncertainty. We propose BayesNCF-v2, a single-model Bayesian neural collaborative filtering framework that combines a Bayes-by-Backprop output layer with a heteroscedastic head trained under the Gaussian NLL, thereby jointly learning aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Across five seeds and three datasets, compared to standard NCF, it reduces ECE by 25-73% and NLL by 7-20%, while its calibration performance shows no statistically significant difference from heteroscedastic MC dropout and approaches that of a heteroscedastic deep ensemble consisting of five models, despite having significantly fewer parameters. For cold-start users, the learned aleatoric variance increases, thereby reducing the ECE for cold-start users on three datasets. These results hold consistently across both random and temporal partitions, demonstrating that heteroscedastic aleatoric modeling is the main driver of calibration in these experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.