Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793924›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

High-Dimensional Linear Preference Model.

Gil Ariel, Omer Peleg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gil ArielDepartment of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7251-5383
Omer PelegDepartment of Mathematics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel.ORCID 0009-0003-5752-7743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a branch of operations research concerned with choices based on several quantifiable factors. Here, we focus on high-dimensional markets, in which each available product is described by a large number of features. Taking a probabilistic approach, we define a market as a collection of alternatives in a decision-making scenario governed by a linear utility function. Analytic approximations for the market share and its moments are derived in the limit of a large population and a large number of measured features. We identify a single parameter, termed the degree of subjectivity, that places markets on a continuous spectrum ranging from fully objective to fully subjective. At an intermediate value, the market is competitive in the sense that it maximizes the entropy of the market-share distribution. Empirical analysis of several real markets indicates that they can indeed be classified by this parameter, yielding predictable decision patterns and a unified, relative measure of competitiveness across markets. Simulations involving non-linear utility functions and a trained machine-learning classifier provide preliminary evidence that similar behavior may also arise beyond the linear model, suggesting that the degree of subjectivity may be useful as a diagnostic in some broader multi-feature decision problems.

Indexed as

competitivenessdiscrete choiceentropyhigh-dimensional limitmulti-attribute utilitypreference markets

Identifiers

PMID42793924
PMCPMC13605934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.