ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Error Estimation of Signed Networks Based on Expectation-Maximization Algorithm.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data obtained from experiments and surveys in human social systems are inevitably influenced by systematic measurement errors, and network data are no exception. Despite the prevalence of error in social network data, current research often lacks rigorous estimation of its expected precision, which may lead to biased conclusions. Signed networks, which encode both positive and negative relationships, constitute an important component of network science, and conducting measurement error analysis on them can substantially enhance the accuracy of social network analysis. This paper proposes a set of error measurement tools based on the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm, specifically designed to estimate errors in signed network data. We extend traditional experimental error estimation to the network domain, derive a general error estimation method for signed networks, and validate its scientific validity and practical utility through extensive simulation experiments on both synthetic and real-world networks. The experiments reveal that network density and the ratio of positive to negative edges significantly influence the posterior probability distribution of the adjacency matrix. Specifically, as density increases, edge estimation accuracy exhibits a U-shaped trend, and the proportion of negative edges shows a nonlinear relationship with accuracy. The proposed method is applicable to repeatedly measured signed networks and provides a reliable framework for reconstructing network structures as faithfully as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.