Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793884›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Scaling Analysis of Seismic Ground Motion Signals.

Giuliana Paradiso, Federica Di Michele, Matteo Colangeli, Bruno Rubino, Lamberto Rondoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giuliana ParadisoDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-0296-8498
Federica Di MicheleIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1244-6942
Matteo ColangeliDepartment of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7424-7888
Bruno RubinoDepartment of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6546-8390
Lamberto RondoniDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-6279

Funding

University of L'Aquila
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthquakes exhibit well-documented statistical regularities at the catalogue level, such as the Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-frequency relation and the Omori-Utsu aftershock decay, often interpreted as signatures of seismicity as a driven, dissipative system far from thermodynamic equilibrium. However, whether comparable signatures, such as scale invariance and anomalous diffusion, can be detected directly within individual ground motion recordings remains an open question. This work investigates whether acceleration, velocity, and displacement signals recorded during the 2009 Mw 6.1 L'Aquila earthquake display statistical properties consistent with non-equilibrium complex systems, and whether different seismic phases carry distinct, reproducible statistical signatures. P- and S-wave onset times are estimated using AR-AIC, with adaptive search windows centred on theoretical arrivals from the CRUST1.0 velocity model. Coda onset is determined using three complementary criteria combined into a median ensemble, enabling the segmentation of each recording into up to five temporal windows. Displacement moment scaling is analysed for each window and signal type, within the framework of strong anomalous diffusion, yielding the scaling exponents ζ(q). Robustness is systematically assessed against the choice of coda onset method, the empirical thresholds defining coda onset and end, the sub-interval of τ used in the moment scaling fit, and the filter band applied to the ground motion signals. Evidence for anomalous diffusion is nuanced: both its sign and magnitude depend on the seismic phase, with only a subset of configurations remaining stable across all segmentation schemes tested. These results indicate that anomalous scaling signatures, when present, are not universal, and that systematic robustness analyses are essential to distinguish genuine physical effects from segmentation artefacts.

Indexed as

anomalous diffusiondissipative phenomenamoment scalingnon-equilibrium statistical mechanicsphase detectionseismic ground motion

Identifiers

PMID42793884
PMCPMC13605109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.