Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793875›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Differentially Private Hierarchical Spectral Clustering.

Mohamed Seif Mohamed, Andrea J Goldsmith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamed Seif MohamedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Andrea J GoldsmithDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study hierarchical spectral graph clustering under edge differential privacy (DP) through the lens of iterative eigenvector estimation on adjacency matrices. We propose a differentially private recursive spectral framework, where each binary partition is obtained via a rank-one noisy power method applied to induced adjacency sub-matrices. At each iteration, carefully calibrated Gaussian noise is injected into the matrix-vector multiplication, ensuring (ε,δ)-edge DP under cumulative privacy accounting across both power iterations and recursive hierarchy levels while preserving the essential convergence properties of the classical power method. We provide a non-asymptotic analysis of the resulting noisy iterations, characterizing the trade-off between privacy and accuracy via explicit bounds on the eigenvector estimation error. In particular, we quantify how the noise variance, number of iterations, eigengap, and hierarchy depth jointly influence the accuracy of each recursive split and the overall clustering performance. Empirical evaluations on synthetic and real-world networks validate the theoretical predictions and demonstrate that the proposed method achieves strong multi-scale clustering performance under meaningful privacy budgets.

Indexed as

differential privacyeigengapgraph Laplacianhierarchical spectral clusteringnoisy power iterationrandom graph modelsstochastic block models

Identifiers

PMID42793875
PMCPMC13605903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.