ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Kernel-Weighted Aggregation for Hyperparameter-Free Quantum Federated Learning.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Quantum federated learning (QFL) enables collaborative training of variational quantum circuits across decentralized clients, but client drift under non-IID data distributions degrades standard Federated Averaging (FedAvg). Existing aggregation methods either introduce tunable hyperparameters that depend on unknown data heterogeneity or incur structural costs such as order-dependent error propagation. We propose Kernel-Weighted Aggregation (KWA), a hyperparameter-free aggregation strategy that constructs a non-parametric kernel density estimate over the received client parameter vectors at each communication round. Clients in high-density regions receive greater voting power, and isolated clients are automatically attenuated. The kernel bandwidth is the median of all pairwise squared distances. We evaluate KWA against six state-of-the-art QFL methods and five classical robust baselines on five binary MNIST digit-pair tasks under IID, Dir(0.5), and Dir(0.1) distributions with a unified four-qubit benchmark. Under IID data, KWA recovers the performance of FedAvg. Under Dir(0.5), KWA attains the highest average accuracy (0.7120), followed by FedAvg (0.7093). The margin at N=4 clients is not statistically significant. It grows to +0.023 at N=16 in the client scaling experiment. Under this distribution, the five classical robust baselines also rank below FedAvg. Under Dir(0.1), KWA exceeds FedAvg by 0.028 on average, with a pooled paired
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.