Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793867›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Performance Evaluation of Bayesian Network Learning Algorithms in Structural Equation Modeling: A Simulation Study.

Tugay Karadag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tugay KaradagDepartment of Statistics, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 32220, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3579-7764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian Network (BN) learning algorithms may exhibit substantially different performance across graph structures, sample sizes, and evaluation criteria. Comparative evidence on BN learning under structurally validated conditions remains limited. This study evaluates BN learning algorithms for causal discovery through a simulation-based framework that integrates multiple graph structures, sample sizes, and structural equation modeling (SEM)-based validation within a common design. Fourteen constraint-based, score-based, and hybrid algorithms were examined across five randomly generated directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) containing latent constructs and four sample sizes (

Indexed as

Bayesian network learningcausal discoveryhybrid algorithmssimulation studystructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID42793867
PMCPMC13604978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.