ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Adenomyosis and Uterine Fibroids: Two Distinct Yet Overlapping Clinical Entities.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenomyosis and uterine fibroids are among the most common benign uterine disorders in women of reproductive age and represent major causes of abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, and infertility. Despite their distinct histopathological features, they frequently coexist and share several hormonal and molecular mechanisms, making diagnosis and treatment challenging. This narrative review examines the current evidence on their epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, reproductive impact, and therapeutic management, with particular attention to the role of imaging in the differential diagnosis and management of coexisting disease. A non-systematic narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus. Relevant original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements, and clinical guidelines addressing adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, imaging, fertility, and treatment were considered. Additional references were identified through manual screening of the bibliographies of the retrieved articles. Although adenomyosis and uterine fibroids differ in their biological origin and morphological appearance, they commonly present with overlapping symptoms, including heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and reproductive dysfunction. Transvaginal ultrasound remains the first-line imaging modality, whereas magnetic resonance imaging is particularly valuable in complex cases, lesion characterization, and preoperative assessment. Accurate imaging phenotyping may help distinguish isolated from coexisting disease and support individualized medical, surgical, or minimally invasive treatment planning. A structured imaging-based approach integrated with clinical findings and reproductive goals may improve disease characterization and support individualized management of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. Further standardization of imaging criteria and validation of emerging diagnostic technologies may improve patient stratification and treatment selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.