ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: Specialty-Oriented Practical Guide.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an increasingly important component of dentomaxillofacial radiology, with applications ranging from panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to magnetic resonance imaging, radiomics, and other emerging AI approaches. As AI studies become more methodologically complex, concerns regarding transparency, reproducibility, validation, and clinical applicability have also increased. Several reporting resources, including reporting guidelines, methodological quality assessment tools, and broader principles for trustworthy AI, have been developed to improve the quality and transparency of AI research. However, selecting the most appropriate resource remains challenging, particularly for studies that combine radiomics, predictive modeling, diagnostic accuracy assessment, segmentation, multimodal AI, and clinical validation. This specialty-oriented practical guide provides an overview of the main AI reporting resources and offers practical recommendations to support their selection and complementary use in dentomaxillofacial radiology. Common study designs, methodological challenges, and reporting considerations are discussed, together with practical guidance for readers and reviewers. The complementary roles of different reporting resources are illustrated through tables, decision aids, conceptual figures, and examples from the dentomaxillofacial imaging literature. By promoting more transparent and consistent reporting practices, this guide aims to support the development of more reproducible, clinically relevant, and trustworthy AI research in dentomaxillofacial radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.