Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42793744›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: Specialty-Oriented Practical Guide.

Elaine Dinardi Barioni, Lays Assolini Pinheiro de Oliveira, Marcos Murilo Alves Santos, Kaan Orhan, Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro Lopes, Andre Luiz Ferreira Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elaine Dinardi BarioniPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo 01506-000, SP, Brazil.
Lays Assolini Pinheiro de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo 01506-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-0069
Marcos Murilo Alves SantosDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, The Institute of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, SP, Brazil.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-0176
Sérgio Lúcio Pereira de Castro LopesDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery, The Institute of Sciences and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos 12245-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-5862
Andre Luiz Ferreira CostaPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology and Imaging Laboratory, Cruzeiro do Sul University (UNICSUL), São Paulo 01506-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4856-5417

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 318953/2025-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an increasingly important component of dentomaxillofacial radiology, with applications ranging from panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to magnetic resonance imaging, radiomics, and other emerging AI approaches. As AI studies become more methodologically complex, concerns regarding transparency, reproducibility, validation, and clinical applicability have also increased. Several reporting resources, including reporting guidelines, methodological quality assessment tools, and broader principles for trustworthy AI, have been developed to improve the quality and transparency of AI research. However, selecting the most appropriate resource remains challenging, particularly for studies that combine radiomics, predictive modeling, diagnostic accuracy assessment, segmentation, multimodal AI, and clinical validation. This specialty-oriented practical guide provides an overview of the main AI reporting resources and offers practical recommendations to support their selection and complementary use in dentomaxillofacial radiology. Common study designs, methodological challenges, and reporting considerations are discussed, together with practical guidance for readers and reviewers. The complementary roles of different reporting resources are illustrated through tables, decision aids, conceptual figures, and examples from the dentomaxillofacial imaging literature. By promoting more transparent and consistent reporting practices, this guide aims to support the development of more reproducible, clinically relevant, and trustworthy AI research in dentomaxillofacial radiology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecone-beam computed tomographydiagnostic imagingradiomicsreporting guidelines

Identifiers

PMID42793744
PMCPMC13605458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.