ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Radiomics for Diagnosis, Phenotyping and Risk Stratification of Cardiomyopathies.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference non-invasive imaging modality for evaluating cardiomyopathies, providing comprehensive assessment of cardiac morphology, function, and tissue characterization. Radiomics has recently emerged as an advanced image analysis technique that extracts quantitative imaging biomarkers from routine CMR images, potentially enhancing disease characterization beyond conventional visual assessment. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the role of CMR-based radiomics in the diagnosis, phenotypic characterization and risk stratification of cardiomyopathies.
methodsA structured search identified English-language, peer-reviewed studies published up to August 2026 investigating CMR-based radiomics in hypertrophic, dilated, arrhythmogenic, and infiltrative cardiomyopathies, including cardiac amyloidosis, Fabry disease, and cardiac sarcoidosis. Study selection followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and the Radiomics Quality Score 2.0 (RQS 2.0) The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.
resultsCurrent evidence indicates that CMR radiomics provides incremental diagnostic information beyond conventional CMR by quantifying myocardial tissue heterogeneity. Radiomic features derived from cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, native T1/T2 mapping, and extracellular volume maps showed promising performance in differentiating cardiomyopathy subtypes, distinguishing pathological from physiological remodeling, and identifying infiltrative and inflammatory myocardial diseases. Multiparametric radiomic models generally outperformed individual imaging biomarkers, with preliminary evidence supporting applications in risk stratification and outcome prediction. However, studies were predominantly retrospective, involved small cohorts, used heterogeneous imaging and radiomics workflows, and rarely included external validation. RQS 2.0 assessment demonstrated low-to-moderate methodological quality.
conclusionsCMR-based radiomics shows considerable potential for improving diagnosis and phenotypic characterization of cardiomyopathies. However, methodological standardization, multicenter prospective validation, and demonstration of incremental clinical value are required before routine clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.