ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Integrating Primary Health Care into Flexible Surge Capacity: Bridging the Subnational "Missing Middle" in Health Emergency Preparedness.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health emergencies are governed nationally but experienced locally, where primary health care (PHC) plays a central role in maintaining essential services, surveillance, medication access, chronic disease management, communication, and recovery. Flexible surge capacity (FSC) was developed as a cross-sector approach for identifying and preparing additional personnel, facilities, supplies, systems, and community capabilities, but PHC has not been explicitly integrated into the concept. This narrative conceptual review examined how emergency-ready PHC can be incorporated into FSC at the subnational level. The literature identification followed two complementary streams: one addressing PHC and health-emergency preparedness and another concept-directed stream addressing the foundational and subsequent FSC literature. Following relevance screening, 31 core publications were retained for conceptual synthesis. The two evidence streams were compared to identify functional convergence, required adaptations, governance and clinical safeguards, activation considerations, and evidence gaps. The resulting framework positions PHC as defining essential functions that should be sustained during emergencies, while FSC provides additional cross-sector capability when routine functional capacity becomes insufficient. The proposed PHC-integrated FSC model therefore represents a continuity-and-surge approach rather than solely an expansion of acute-care capacity. The model is conceptual, and its downstream effects should be regarded as hypotheses for future evaluation rather than established effectiveness claims. PHC-integrated FSC should complement, not replace, adequately resourced routine PHC and existing emergency-response systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.