ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
HealthCare Complexity Index (HCIn): A Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Primary Care.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopulation ageing, multimorbidity, and chronic conditions have increased the demand for person-centred care in Primary Health Care. Current stratification systems rely on diagnoses or resource utilization and fail to capture the multidimensional nature of care complexity, which also depends on functional, social, environmental factors.
objectiveTo develop a HealthCare Complexity Index using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data and the Person-Centred Care Knowledge Model. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective, cross-sectional observational study was conducted in Primary Health Care in the Community of Madrid (Spain). Deductive Care Methodology was used to identify functional assessment variables associated with four care dimensions: vulnerability, risk, etiology, and signs/symptoms. A multidisciplinary expert panel selected and validated the variables through iterative consensus rounds. A weighted scoring algorithm, the Care Complexity Index, was designed to quantify care complexity on a 0-100 scale. Relationships between the selected variables and NANDA-I nursing diagnoses were established and validated by an expert in standardized nursing languages.
results27 assessment variables were identified and classified into the 4 dimensions of the care model. These variables were integrated into a weighted complexity index with five severity levels ranging from low to critical complexity. Furthermore, 48 NANDA-I nursing diagnoses were linked to the selected variables.
conclusionsThe HealthCare Complexity Index provides a standardized, person-centred approach for estimating care complexity using routinely available (EHR) data. It may support early identification of individuals with complex care needs, facilitate individualized care planning, and strengthen clinical decision-making. Future studies should validate its predictive performance and implementation in other clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.