ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Preventable, Yet Unprevented: The Cervical Cancer Screening Landscape in Eastern Europe and Bulgaria.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable malignancies, yet disparities in survival remain a significant public health burden across Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Bulgaria illustrates this paradox: HPV vaccination coverage is very low, and prevention continues to rely substantially on opportunistic screening, although recent national initiatives have introduced HPV-based testing and self-sampling. This article argues that the primary barrier to cervical cancer control in Bulgaria is not the lack of medical technology, but the absence of a structured, organized screening system. A modern national cervical cancer screening program should be recognized as a structured clinical and organizational pathway rather than a single diagnostic test. Such a programme requires population identification, active invitation and recall, reg-istry-based tracking, standardized referral and follow-up pathways, and continuous quality assurance. Primary high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing provides high sensitivity and excellent negative predictive value, supporting longer screening intervals; however, screening for HPV positivity alone is insufficient as a sole referral criterion because many infections are transient and clinically insignificant. We propose a rational framework for cervical cancer screening in Bulgaria and comparable health systems: invitation-based screening for women aged 25-65 years built on primary hrHPV testing with genotyping, reflex cytology, and selective use of p16/Ki-67 dual staining. Drawing on a regional comparison of HPV vaccination and screening programs and on Bulgarian cost-of-illness data, we argue that transitioning from opportunistic testing to an integrated, registry-based screening cascade is essential for effective and equitable cervical cancer prevention in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.