ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Dental Implants After Head and Neck Radiotherapy: From Chronological Waiting Rules to Implant-Bed-Specific Risk Stratification.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implant-supported rehabilitation is a key component of functional survivorship care for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy (RT). Despite its importance, implant outcomes in this population are frequently interpreted through simplified paradigms such as irradiated versus non-irradiated status, prescribed tumor dose, pre-RT versus post-RT placement, and arbitrary post-RT waiting intervals. This narrative review proposes a radiobiology-informed, implant-bed-specific framework for assessing implant viability following HNC RT. The biologically relevant exposure is best defined as the localized radiation dose delivered to the implant bed, considered in conjunction with fractionation, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions, recipient substrate, soft-tissue condition, prosthetic loading, systemic host factors, and late toxicity risk. Distinctions among early osseointegration, implant survival, implant success, prosthetic rehabilitation, and patient-centered functional benefit are essential, as retained implants do not necessarily equate to durable or meaningful rehabilitation. Post-RT timing should be understood as a contextual variable rather than a universal chronological determinant, since longer intervals do not inherently indicate progressive biological recovery and may be confounded by survivor and clinician selection. Future research should prioritize implant-bed-specific dosimetry, continuous modeling of dose and timing, standardized outcome measures, cluster-adjusted statistical approaches, time-to-event analyses, and explicit reporting of osteoradionecrosis as a distinct implant-relevant late toxicity endpoint. Shifting from chronological waiting rules to implant-bed-specific risk stratification may enhance the safety, interpretability, and clinical relevance of dental implant rehabilitation following HNC RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.