ReviewBrain sciences2026
Supporting Visual Working Memory in Healthy Aging: A Review of Current Interventions and Perspectives on Future Approaches.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual working memory (vWM) undergoes age-related decline, affecting storage capacity, representational precision, feature binding, and inhibitory control, with consequences for everyday functioning. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence indicates that the aging brain retains substantial plasticity, providing an opportunity of intervention. This review synthesizes current evidence on approaches to improving vWM in healthy older adults, including classic and game-based cognitive training, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), and multimodal protocols that combine cognitive training with physical exercise or brain stimulation. Across the literature, process-based cognitive training produces improvements on trained and closely related tasks, whereas evidence for durable far-transfer remains limited. NIBS demonstrates promising neurophysiological effects, particularly when targeting frontoparietal networks, although behavioral outcomes remain heterogeneous and appear to depend on stimulation parameters and individual characteristics. Emerging findings further suggest that combining interventions may enhance selected aspects of vWM, highlighting the importance of personalized approaches. Despite these advances, intervention effects are often modest, task-specific, and resource-intensive. As a complementary approach, the review proposes placebo and nocebo effects as a theoretically grounded hypothesis that warrants empirical investigation for potentially complementing existing interventions and promoting healthy cognitive aging rather than confounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.