ArticleBrain sciences2026
Early Risk Stratification and Time-to-Cure Analysis in Patients with Residual Hemifacial Spasm After Microvascular Decompression.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMicrovascular decompression (MVD) is an effective treatment for hemifacial spasm (HFS), but some patients have residual spasms after surgery. Some later achieve delayed cure, whereas others have persistent HFS, making reoperation planning difficult. This study aimed to develop a prediction model for early risk stratification in patients with residual HFS after MVD.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 500 consecutive patients with primary HFS who underwent MVD between November 2021 and August 2023. Among them, 140 patients with residual HFS at 24 h postoperatively were included. Clinical variables, intraoperative abnormal muscle response, Cohen grade at 24 h after surgery (Cohen-post), and Immediate Subjective Improvement Rate (ISIR) were collected. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed and presented as a nomogram, with bootstrap internal validation. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess time to cure.
resultsMean follow-up was 21.9 months. Delayed cure occurred in 102 patients (72.9%), whereas 38 (27.1%) had persistent HFS. The final model included ISIR, Cohen-post, and offending artery status. The nomogram showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.901). Patients with higher ISIR and lower Cohen-post recovered faster. Among patients with delayed cure, median time to cure was 30 days, and 95% achieved cure within 300 days after surgery.
conclusionsIn patients with residual HFS at 24 h after MVD, a nomogram incorporating ISIR, Cohen-post, and offending artery status may help distinguish delayed cure from persistent HFS and may provide useful information on the likelihood of further recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.