ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2026
Methotrexate-Cyclodextrin Systems: Molecular Recognition, Formulation Design, and Translational Perspectives.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) remains central to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and several malignancies, yet its use is complicated by dose-dependent toxicity, variable oral exposure, photolability, and pH-dependent solubility. Cyclodextrins (CDs) can alter the molecular environment of MTX, but the literature often conflates true inclusion complexes with formulations in which CD merely forms part of a larger carrier. This review critically distinguishes direct MTX-CD complexes, dosage forms built from a preformed complex, CD-containing carriers without direct evidence of cavity occupancy, and covalent MTX-CD conjugates. Particular attention is given to binding stoichiometry, apparent association constants, guest orientation, preparation methods, and the evidence needed to establish inclusion. Both solution-state host-guest association and isolated solid products are considered; however, solid-state changes are treated as supportive evidence rather than as stand-alone proof of cyclodextrin cavity occupancy. Among the limited head-to-head comparisons of native cyclodextrins, β-CD generally showed more favorable MTX recognition than α- or γ-CD, although the magnitude of this difference is method- and condition-dependent. Complexation can improve dissolution, photostability, and oral or local delivery; however, greater solubilization does not necessarily enhance membrane transport. In carrageenan hydrogels, β-CD increased MTX loading and release while reducing membrane permeation, illustrating the importance of the equilibrium between complexed and freely permeating drug. The most promising systems remain preclinical. Progress toward translation will require clearer nomenclature, orthogonal structural characterization, mechanism-resolving controls, and standardized pharmacokinetic and safety studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.