ArticleBiomolecules2026
Assessment of Aggregation- and Condensation-Prone Regions of Proteins Involved in Neurodegenerative, Neurological and Mental-State Diseases.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over more than a decade of development, various data-driven computational approaches based on the physicochemical properties of proteins have been developed for estimating the aggregation potential of proteins. The currently available algorithms and models enable a sequence-based design strategy to predict regions prone to transform into liquid-liquid phase-separated (LLPS) condensed or solidified aggregated states; for the latter, one can distinguish amyloid and prion-like aggregates. In this study, we performed a comprehensive in silico experiment; more than 40 models were used to test amino acid sequences of various proteins known to aggregate in neurodegenerative diseases, certain progressive myoclonic epilepsies and mental illnesses. Altogether, 20 proteins were analyzed and their proneness to aggregate or condensate was discussed in view of their possible normal and/or toxic function. The reported large set of computational models enables highly accurate predictions of proteins that are prone to aggregation and/or condensation. Furthermore, such aggregation profiling can be performed for any protein sequence of interest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.