ArticleBiomolecules2026
Isolation and Characterization of Rabbit Spermatogonial Stem Cells as a Promising Animal Genetic Resource for Biodiversity Protection.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The continual spermatogenesis throughout adulthood is ensured by a rare and unique cell group named spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), which undergo self-renewal and/or differentiate into sperm cells. SSCs also become a promising genetic source for the protection of animal biodiversity. However, the isolation and culture of SSCs in vitro is still a big challenge and poorly explored in rabbits. The main objective of this study was to isolate, culture, and deeply characterize SSCs obtained from rabbit testes. Briefly, rabbit testicular tissue was mechanically and enzymatically dissociated, and obtained testicular somatic and germ cells were cultured for a short term in culture media supplemented with specific molecular factors maintaining SSC self-renewal and proliferation (GDNF, GFRα-1, FGF2, etc.). Immunofluorescent and PCR techniques were used for molecular profiling of cultured SSCs, while TEM analysis revealed their ultrastructure. After a few weeks, round and grape-like SSC colonies emerged, growing on the feeder cell layer. Rabbit SSCs showed positive staining for DBA, GFRA1, PLZF, RET, PGP9.5, DAZL, and DDX4. Increased expression of additional SSC markers was noticed using RT-qPCR and dd PCR (RET, PLZF, PGP9.5, DAZL, DDX4, CDH1, CD9, CD14, CD90, c-kit, ALDH, SSEA-4, SALL4, OCT4, and SOX2), while ultrastructure typical for primitive undifferentiated cells was observed under TEM. In conclusion, we successfully established a method for rabbit SSC isolation, culture, and phenotyping, which might facilitate their collection for further cryopreservation. However, the self-renewal, proliferative, and differentiation capacities of cultured SSCs still need to be confirmed through an in vivo SSC transplantation experiment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.