ArticleBiomolecules2026
Contact Occupancy and Per-Residue Energetic Contributions Distinguish Aflatoxin B1 Nanobodies with Different Binding Affinities.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a potent foodborne mycotoxin for which nanobodies offer compact, engineerable detection reagents, yet the molecular basis of their affinity differences remains poorly defined. Here, closely related nanobodies G8, NB28, and NB26 were compared. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy showed G8 had the lowest dissociation constant for AFB1-BSA, followed by NB28 and NB26. To resolve this affinity separation, we performed triplicate 3 μs molecular dynamics simulations for each complex. While all complexes remained stable, G8 maintained broader, persistent aromatic and hydrophobic contacts extending into its elongated CDR3, whereas NB28 and NB26 relied on localized contacts centered on PHE47 and TRP101. Per-residue MM/GBSA decomposition confirmed favorable thermodynamic contributions from these persistent G8 residues. Ultimately, integrating contact occupancy, energy decomposition, and pairwise co-occurrence identified distinct cooperative contact networks (six in G8, versus two in NB28/NB26). This workflow demonstrates how mapping dynamic, cooperative binding networks rather than static proximity can systematically prioritize candidate residues for engineering high-affinity detection reagents in food-safety surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.