ReviewBiomolecules2026
Construction and Applicability Scenarios of 3D Neurovascular Unit Models In Vitro.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neurovascular unit (NVU) is composed of a diverse array of cells and an extracellular matrix (ECM). Neural cells and blood vessels are intricately interconnected, forming a cohesive whole. Specific cellular components and structures within the NVU play an indispensable role in maintaining homeostasis of the central nervous system (CNS). With the advancement and maturation of cell co-culture technology, various three-dimensional (3D) NVU models continue to emerge, offering a more objective and comprehensive perspective for in vitro studies of CNS diseases. Specifically, these 3D NVU models include Transwell Chamber models, gel-polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based 3D models, self-assembled NVU models and microfluidic NVU models, which reconstruct the complex NVU architecture to varying degrees. This review systematically summarizes multiple 3D construction strategies for in vitro NVU to overcome the limitations of conventional cellular tests or animal experiments, highlights the critical roles of biomimetic gel in recapitulating native cell-gel crosstalk, comparatively analyzes four major 3D NVU technical routes in terms of cellular composition, vascular morphology, barrier performance, and reproducibility, categorizes application scenarios of 3D NVU platforms oriented to practical research demands, including oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) injury modeling, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability assay, CNS drug penetration screening, neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity evaluation, proposes practical principles for model selection under different experimental purposes, and concludes with current bottlenecks, including imperfect vascular network maturation and lack of unified evaluation criteria, together with future perspectives for standardized 3D NVU in vitro. By comparing the advantages and limitations of these approaches, we aim to clarify their optimal applicability for investigating specific pathological mechanisms and screening potential therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.