ReviewBiomolecules2026
State-Dependent FGF Signaling in Satellite Cell-Mediated Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Pathological Remodeling.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skeletal muscle regeneration depends on coordinated transitions of muscle stem cells (MuSCs), also known as satellite cells, from quiescence through activation and proliferative expansion to differentiation and fusion, while self-renewal replenishes the quiescent MuSC pool within a dynamically remodeled niche. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling regulates these transitions, but its effects vary as MuSCs and their niche change across regenerative stages. FGF output is shaped by ligand availability and extracellular presentation, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) isoform expression and coreceptor availability, receptor trafficking, intracellular feedback, and the state of the responding cell. Following acute injury, FGF inputs can support MuSC activation and expansion; signaling is subsequently reconfigured during differentiation, fusion, self-renewal, and return to quiescence. Aging-associated regenerative decline, chronic injury and dystrophic remodeling, denervation, and metabolic dysfunction disrupt this coordination and can uncouple FGF activity from productive repair. Rhabdomyosarcoma provides a distinct malignant context in which the FGF network is rewired to sustain oncogenic myogenic cell states. Here, we integrate molecular, cellular, and niche-level evidence across these settings to explain why FGF signaling produces divergent outcomes and to clarify how cellular context and timing should inform therapeutic modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.