ReviewGenes2026
Clinical Utility of Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing Beyond Multigene Panels in Hereditary Cancer.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) has emerged as a powerful genomic approach for investigating Hereditary Cancer predisposition through the comprehensive analysis of coding regions across the genome. Although multigene panels currently represent the standard diagnostic approach for Hereditary Cancer assessment, a substantial proportion of high-risk individuals and families remain molecularly unexplained. In this setting, germline WES may serve as a valuable second-tier strategy by identifying pathogenic variants in genes not routinely included in conventional testing panels and by addressing part of the unresolved "missing heritability" observed across Hereditary Cancer syndromes. Increasing evidence supports its application in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch-like syndrome, colorectal polyposis, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer predisposition, where WES has contributed to the identification of additional susceptibility genes and improved molecular characterization. Beyond Hereditary Cancer diagnostics, exome-based approaches have also been explored for tumour profiling, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assessment, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic stratification. However, despite its significant potential, the clinical implementation of WES remains challenging because of the high burden of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), difficulties in variant interpretation, incidental findings, and the need for robust functional validation of candidate genes. This review critically examines the current evidence supporting the clinical utility of germline WES in Hereditary Cancer syndromes, focusing on the clinical scenarios in which WES may provide meaningful additional information beyond multigene panels, its diagnostic yield, limitations, and future perspectives in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.