ReviewGenes2026
Precision Medicine in Pediatric Nephrology: From Shared Clinical Phenotypes to Genotype-Guided Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric nephrology is shifting from broad phenotype-based labels toward molecularly defined, genotype-guided diagnosis and management. Childhood kidney disorders are enriched for monogenic causes, yet persistent microscopic hematuria, bilateral kidney cysts, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome, and thrombotic microangiopathy may represent shared endpoints of biologically distinct mechanisms. Using these four scenarios, this narrative review illustrates how structured phenotyping, pedigree analysis, biochemical evaluation, and appropriately selected genomic testing can establish etiology, revise diagnoses, and guide clinical decision-making. Molecular diagnosis may support early nephroprotection, prevent ineffective immunosuppression, reveal tumor or extrarenal risks, enable mechanism-based therapy, and optimize transplantation planning. It also enables cascade testing, reproductive counseling, presymptomatic evaluation of relatives, and safer assessment of living-related donors. Genomic findings, however, require clinical context. Variants must be evaluated against gene-disease validity, inheritance, segregation, molecular mechanism, and phenotype, while variants of uncertain significance should not independently determine treatment or donor eligibility. Negative or inconclusive findings should prompt phenotypic reassessment, evaluation of analytical limitations, targeted studies, and periodic genomic reanalysis. Emerging genome and long-read sequencing, multiomics, artificial intelligence, and RNA-based therapeutics may further expand precision care, but rigorous interpretation, equitable access, appropriate counseling, and multidisciplinary collaboration remain essential. Precision nephrology derives value not from identifying variants alone, but from converting molecular etiology into safer, anticipatory, and individualized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.