ArticleGenes2026
Integrative Physiological, Transcriptomic, and Functional Analysis Reveals a Positive Contribution of
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrought tolerance in wheat is a complex trait controlled by multiple regulatory networks, among which calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) act as important components linking stress perception with downstream cellular responses. However, the functional contribution of individual CDPK members to drought adaptation in wheat remains largely unclear. This study aimed to identify and functionally characterize drought-responsive
methodsTwo wheat lines derived from the same breeding background exhibiting contrasting drought adaption, 23B1 and 23B39, were subjected to PEG6000-induced osmotic stress. Growth traits, osmotic adjustment-related metabolites, membrane damage indicators, and antioxidant enzyme activity were evaluated. Transcriptomic analysis was performed at early drought-response stages, followed by differential expression analysis, functional enrichment, CDPK family screening, and qRT-PCR validation. The role of
resultsThe drought-responsive line 23B1 maintained stronger growth, accumulated higher levels of proline and soluble sugars, exhibited enhanced peroxidase activity, and showed reduced membrane lipid peroxidation compared with 23B39. Transcriptome analysis revealed extensive transcriptional reprogramming under drought stress, with differentially expressed genes mainly associated with metabolic adjustment, transport regulation, secondary metabolism, and stress-responsive pathways. Among the identified CDPK members,
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.