ReviewGenes2026
Alternative RNA Splicing in Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Functional Consequences, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Opportunities.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alternative pre-mRNA splicing is a central layer of gene regulation that enables a limited number of genes to generate a far larger and more context-dependent transcriptome and proteome. In cancer, splicing is disrupted by mutations in cis-regulatory sequences, recurrent lesions in spliceosome components, altered abundance or activity of RNA-binding proteins, and changes in transcription, chromatin, RNA modification, metabolism and stress signalling. These alterations are not merely by-products of malignant transformation. They can create oncogenic protein isoforms, eliminate tumour-suppressive products, remodel cellular identity, promote metastasis and drug resistance, and generate tumour-restricted peptides that are visible to the immune system. Large pan-cancer datasets, long-read sequencing, single-cell isoform profiling, proteogenomics and functional perturbation screens are now resolving this complexity at unprecedented scale. In parallel, multiple therapeutic strategies are advancing, including modulators of the SF3B complex, molecular glues that degrade RBM39, inhibitors of protein arginine methyltransferases and splicing kinases, splice-switching oligonucleotides, programmable RNA-targeting systems, and vaccines or T-cell receptors directed against splicing-derived neoantigens. This review integrates the molecular logic of splice-site selection with the cancer-specific mechanisms that perturb it, summarizes representative isoform switches across the hallmarks of cancer, evaluates emerging technologies and clinical biomarkers, and discusses the opportunities and constraints of translating splicing biology into precision oncology. Particular emphasis is placed on tumour specificity, intratumoural heterogeneity, proteomic validation, therapeutic windows and rational combination strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.