ReviewBiomedicines2026
The Gut-Heart-Kidney Axis in Heart Failure: Trimethylamine N-Oxide and Beyond-A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), a gut microbiota-derived metabolite of dietary choline and L-carnitine, has emerged as a leading molecular mediator of the gut-heart-kidney axis in heart failure (HF). This state-of-the-art narrative review synthesizes evidence from 14 observational studies (13 prospective cohorts and one cross-sectional analysis), encompassing a heterogeneous range of HF settings, including established chronic HF, acute decompensated HF, incident HF in community cohorts, and subclinical myocardial injury. Across these populations, elevated circulating TMAO has been associated with adverse outcomes, including mortality, rehospitalization, and major adverse cardiovascular events, although the strength and consistency of associations vary by HF phenotype, renal function status, and population ancestry. The prognostic independence of TMAO is attenuated after adjusting for renal function in several cohorts, reflecting both obligatory renal clearance and a potentially bidirectional relationship with kidney injury. TMAO was not reduced during neurohormonal GDMT uptitration in the BIOSTAT-CHF study, suggesting that gut microbiota dysbiosis may represent a pathophysiological axis not reached by current HF treatment. The field has evolved through three thematic stages: TMAO as a single prognostic biomarker, TMAO within cardiorenal pathophysiology, and multimetabolite and multipathway risk profiling. Beyond the TMAO pathway, emerging evidence for phenylacetylglutamine (PAGln), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and protein-bound uremic toxins as parallel gut-derived cardiovascular mediators supports a multidimensional metabolite profiling approach. Several cohorts suggest that selected multimetabolite panels may provide additional prognostic information beyond TMAO alone, although their composition, calibration, and external validity remain uncertain. Population-specific variation in TMAO levels and prognostic thresholds complicates universal clinical application. Without human interventional data demonstrating that lowering TMAO improves cardiovascular outcomes, TMAO remains a prognostic risk marker rather than a validated clinical target. Clinical translation requires resolving the renal confounding problem, validating multimetabolite panels across diverse populations, and conducting intervention trials targeting the gut-heart-kidney axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.