ReviewBiomedicines2026
Vanishing Twin Syndrome After In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer: Mechanisms, Perinatal Consequences, Diagnostic Pitfalls, and Prevention.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vanishing twin syndrome (VTS) denotes the spontaneous loss of one conceptus from an initially recognized multiple pregnancy, most often during the first trimester. Its clinical relevance has increased with in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), as multiple embryo transfer creates the substrate for dizygotic VTS, while blastocyst transfer may be followed by monozygotic splitting and serial early ultrasonography increases detection. However, the literature remains heterogeneous, with empty gestational sacs, losses after fetal cardiac activity, and later single fetal demise often grouped together despite different biological and prognostic implications. New evidence published in recent years on frozen embryo transfer outcomes, cell-free DNA screening, and early childhood development warrants an updated synthesis of vanishing twin syndrome to inform individualized risk assessment, counselling, and standardized research reporting. Overall, the surviving singleton appears to have a lower risk than an ongoing twin pregnancy but a higher risk than a primary singleton, particularly for preterm birth, low birthweight, and small-for-gestational-age birth, with risk increasing when loss occurs after fetal cardiac activity or later in gestation. Nevertheless, evidence is not unanimous, as several well-characterized cohorts and earlier meta-analyses reported no measurable perinatal disadvantage. Two reports from a single tertiary center, based on substantially overlapping recruitment periods, further suggest that VTS may be proportionally less frequent among established twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI than after spontaneous conception, while IVF-associated VTS has been linked to placental abnormalities, diabetes, and fetal growth restriction; this observation requires independent confirmation. Contemporary frozen embryo transfer cohorts indicate that VTS remains relevant in modern practice, whereas limited long-term data have not demonstrated impaired early childhood growth or development. Management should document the initial number of gestational sacs, embryonic structures, cardiac activity, chorionicity, and timing of loss, while adapting aneuploidy screening to residual trophoblastic DNA and individualizing fetal-growth surveillance. Elective single-embryo transfer remains the most effective preventive strategy, although it cannot eliminate monozygotic twinning. Standardized definitions and long-term offspring follow-up are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.