Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792751›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2026

Natural Products and Neuroregeneration: Rethinking Discovery Beyond Bioavailability Through Pseudo-Natural Product Design.

Solomon Habtemariam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Solomon HabtemariamPharmacognosy Research & Herbal Analysis Services UK, 124 City Road, London EC1V 2NX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-2244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural product (NP)-based neuroregeneration research has generated extensive preclinical evidence over the past five decades. Pharmacological activity across core processes of central nervous system (CNS) repair including neurogenesis, axonal regeneration, and neuroplasticity have been documented. Despite consistent observations of neurite outgrowth, neuroprotection, and partial functional recovery in cellular and animal models, translation into durable clinical therapies has remained limited. Neurotrophins such as nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) similarly exhibit strong regenerative effects in experimental systems, but even direct central administration has failed to produce sustained long-distance axonal regeneration or stable circuit reconstruction. This suggests that delivery constraints alone do not explain the failure to achieve clinically-relevant functional repair. It is proposed herein that this limitation reflects intrinsic constraints in how regenerative signalling is organised across multiple biological scales. Integrating evidence from in vitro and in vivo injury models, we can introduce a Target-Mechanism-Network (T-M-N) approach that systematically maps NPs activity onto a hierarchical regulatory architecture. Across diverse NPs classes, ~55 recurrent molecular targets cluster into 10 functional mechanisms, which converge into four higher-order network control regimes governing energetic competence, regenerative signalling capacity, redox-immune balance, and structural plasticity. This analysis reveals that NPs converge on shared regenerative networks but rarely coordinate all required domains within a unified pharmacological programme. They can thus be seen to represent a pre-organised source of evolutionarily selected pharmacophores encoding discrete elements of neuroregenerative network control. On this basis, pseudo-natural product (PNP) design enabled by computational chemistry and phenotypic screening may provide a strategy to recombine these fragments into engineered scaffolds with improved functional selectivity and regenerative coherence. The need to shift drug discovery from optimisation of individual NPs toward architecture-driven design of multi-functional molecules that address the integrated demands of neuroregeneration is discussed.

Indexed as

adult neurogenesisaxonal regenerationcell painting assayneuroplasticityneuroregenerationneurotrophinspseudo-natural productsTrk signalling

Identifiers

PMID42792751
PMCPMC13604641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.