ArticleBiology2026
Seizure-Inducible Risks of In Vivo Optogenetic Manipulations.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optogenetic manipulation is pivotal in basic neuroscience research and in studying neuropsychiatric disorders, enabling the activation or inhibition of neuronal populations with millisecond precision. However, this technique can induce artificial neuronal hypersynchronization that is rarely observed under physiological conditions. Given that epileptic seizures arise from abnormally synchronized neuronal discharges, the potential for optogenetic stimulation to trigger seizures and confound experimental outcomes warrants close examination. Here, using electrophysiological and behavioral recordings, we demonstrate that even single-trial optogenetic stimulation of CaMKII-positive neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region, anterior piriform cortex (APC), or lateral/medial entorhinal cortex (LEnt or MEnt) can induce seizure-like discharges and behaviors in adult male C57BL/6 mice. Repeated stimulation in the APC, LEnt, or MEnt elicited more severe seizure-like activity. Furthermore, stimulation protocols characterized by high power, long duration, high frequency, and medium pulse width were more prone to inducing such events. Additionally, we found that CA1 stimulation could impair subsequent contextual fear memory. These findings provide critical cautions and practical guidelines for the design and implementation of in vivo optogenetic experiments in neuroscience research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.