ArticleBiology2026
paraORA: GPU-Accelerated Exact Over-Representation Analysis for Repeated Queries of Large Gene-Set Libraries.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over-representation analysis (ORA) is widely used to interpret selected-gene lists, including differentially expressed genes and cell-type marker genes. Unlike ranked-list gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA), ORA tests whether selected genes are over-represented in predefined gene sets under an explicit background. Repeated analysis of large gene-set libraries, however, can be computationally costly. GPU-accelerated methods such as rapidGSEA mainly target ranked-list GSEA and do not address repeated exact-ORA processing. We developed paraORA to accelerate repeated ORA by preparing a gene-set library once and reusing its compressed representation across queries. In the GPU-exact path, overlap counting, exact hypergeometric testing, Benjamini-Hochberg correction, and odds-ratio calculation are performed on the GPU. Across 425 numerical validation cases on three GPU models, paraORA agreed with CPU-reference results within the prespecified tolerance while preserving statistical decisions and rankings. On an RTX 4090, the CPU/GPU runtime ratio for the complete in-memory workflow increased from 1.89 for one query to 60.10 for 100 queries against 141,002 gene sets, including one-time preparation but excluding file writing. In a separate complete file-to-file benchmark, GPU-exact was 2.55-fold faster than CPU execution. An exploratory limma reanalysis showed direction-specific Hallmark enrichment. paraORA is available as a web service and an open-source package.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.