ReviewBiology2026
Plant Behaviour, Adaptive Plasticity and Evolution: Reassessing the Debate on Plant Intelligence.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In recent decades, plant sciences have profoundly transformed our philosophical understanding of plants, moving beyond the traditional view of the plant organism as a passive, mechanical entity devoid of agency. Contemporary research into plant physiology, chemical communication and adaptive strategies has helped to outline a theoretical framework: plants emerge as complex systems, capable of environmental perception, signal integration, physiological memory and flexible responses to stimuli. Recent findings have stimulated an extensive interdisciplinary debate on whether plants should be attributed forms of cognition or even intelligence. This paper critically analyses the relationship between plant behaviour and evolutionism, examining the concepts of adaptation, communication and plant intelligence in the light of evolutionary biology, the philosophy of mind and the epistemology of the life sciences. This review examines how the case of plants helps to redefine traditional categories such as organisms, behaviours, subjectivities and cognition. It opens up new theoretical perspectives for a non-anthropocentric philosophy of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.