Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42792567›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

From EEG Source Localization to Brain Network Analysis: A Computational Neuroscience Perspective.

Jooyoung Lee, Tae-Hoon Eom

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jooyoung LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7162-4572
Tae-Hoon EomDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) source localization has evolved from a technical solution to an inverse problem and into a fundamental framework for investigating large-scale brain networks. By reconstructing cortical activity from scalp-recorded signals, source-space EEG improves anatomical interpretability and reduces confounding effects of volume conduction compared with sensor-level analyses. These advances have enabled more reliable estimation of functional and effective connectivity, graph-theoretical characterization of brain networks, and the integration of machine learning for automated analysis and clinical decision support. Nevertheless, the accuracy and reproducibility of source-level analyses remain highly dependent on forward modeling, inverse algorithms, preprocessing strategies, and connectivity estimation methods. Recent methodological developments have further expanded the role of EEG source imaging in computational neuroscience, supporting applications ranging from network-based investigations of brain function to biomarker discovery and disease classification. This review summarizes the computational framework underlying source-level EEG, beginning with the forward and inverse problems and progressing through source reconstruction, connectivity analysis, graph-theoretical network modeling, and emerging machine learning and deep learning techniques. We also highlight current clinical applications and major methodological challenges, including source leakage, model uncertainty, reproducibility, and interpretability, and outline future directions for robust and clinically translatable source-level EEG analysis.

Indexed as

brain network analysisdeep learningEEG source imagingEEG source localizationeffective connectivityforward modelingfunctional connectivitygraph theoryinverse problemmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42792567
PMCPMC13603927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.