ArticleBiology2026
A Detailed Evaluation of the Suitability of Waterbird Habitats in Hangzhou Bay National Wetland Park-A Differential Analysis of Wading Birds and Swimming Birds.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hangzhou Bay is an estuarine ecosystem on the Yangtze River Delta and a key wintering habitat for waterbirds. However, suitable waterbird habitats have been degrading and fracturing. Therefore, we aimed to assess waterbird habitat suitability and identify the principal factors affecting quality in Hangzhou Bay National Wetland Park. Habitat suitability index (HSI) models were constructed for wading and swimming birds using water source conditions, disturbance levels, concealment, and food abundance. The models adopted consistent factor weights but differentiated the grading criteria for the waterbird groups. Applicability was validated using bird survey data collected in 2025, and habitat suitability was quantitatively assessed using field and literature data. Food abundance and water source conditions were dominant factors influencing habitat suitability; concealment and disturbance levels had minor effects. The abundances of wading and swimming birds increased with HSI values, although limited validation sites constrained these relationships. Positive trends indicate that the HSI models may capture the spatial variation in habitat use. Grade III or higher areas comprised 96.67% and 74.21% of the total area for wading and swimming birds, respectively; no Grade I habitats were identified. Overall, the study area provided favorable habitats for waterbirds, although habitat suitability differed between the groups. These findings may provide a quantitative reference for the targeted conservation and restoration of waterbird habitats in the Hangzhou Bay wetland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.