ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Navigating the Human Side of AI: A Socio-Technical Model of Employee Attitudes Toward Algorithmic Recruitment.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates employee perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of recruitment and selection in Saudi Arabian companies. While the use of recruitment systems based on AI is growing, their acceptance by organisations is influenced by whether employees consider these systems to be useful, transparent, and fair, and how this affects their professional judgement. This study is based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) and Socio-Technical Theory (STT) and explores a two-path explanatory model. Perceived usefulness is linked to perceived AI effectiveness in the AI-related pathway and is associated with transparency of AI, trust in AI systems, and organisational support for AI use. On the HR pathway, there is a negative association between technostress and HR support and readiness, while clarity of integration of AI is positively associated with HR support and readiness. The sample comprised 450 purposively selected respondents from Jeddah, Riyadh and Dammam, and data were analysed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in AMOS. The perceived effectiveness of AI and HR's support/readiness for AI was positively and significantly correlated with employee perceptions of AI in recruitment and selection. The relationships of these data should be interpreted as structural relationships; since the data are cross-sectional, they cannot be interpreted as causation or mediation. Further methodological issues include common method bias since all constructs were assessed via self-report and in the same questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.