ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
How Experience of Online Group Polarization Relates to University Students' Value-Related Judgments and Choices: The Parallel Mediating Roles of Cognitive Dissonance and Emotional Contagion.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The psychological processes linking polarization experiences across different online interaction contexts to university students' value-related judgments and choices warrant further investigation. This study distinguishes experienced polarization within online communities (EPC) from experienced polarization in open online discussions (EPD) and examines their associations with university students' value-related judgments and choices, including parallel indirect associations through cognitive dissonance response (CDR) and emotional contagion response (ECR). Data from 2105 valid cross-sectional self-report questionnaires collected at a university in China were randomly divided into two subsamples: 770 cases for exploratory factor analysis and 1335 cases for confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Indirect effects were estimated using 5000 bootstrap resamples. After adjustment for seven covariates covering demographics, internet use, and online participation, both forms of polarization experience were significantly and positively associated with CDR and ECR. Both psychological responses were also significantly and positively associated with value judgment difficulty (VJD) and value choice susceptibility (VCS). All four direct paths from the two forms of polarization experience to VJD and VCS were significant. Standardized estimates for the eight specific indirect effects ranged from 0.032 to 0.198, and all 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals excluded zero. Together, the predictors in the respective regression equations explained 44.4% of the variance in VJD and 54.5% in VCS. These findings provide statistical support for the hypothesized mediation relationships, indicating a pattern in which direct and indirect associations coexist. By distinguishing polarization experiences in specific interaction contexts, the study jointly connects cognitive and emotional responses to judgment formation and the reference points informing choices. It thereby provides empirical evidence for understanding how university students respond to online opinions and forms the basis for their evaluations and choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.