ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Generative Artificial Intelligence Use and Learning Engagement Among Medical Undergraduates: Statistical Indirect and Configurational Associations Involving Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) becomes increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, its relationship with students' learning engagement warrants further investigation. Guided by self-determination theory, this cross-sectional questionnaire study surveyed 498 medical undergraduates at a medical university in China and used structural equation modeling (SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine average associations and configurational patterns among GAI use, basic psychological need satisfaction, and learning engagement. SEM results showed that GAI use was positively but weakly associated with basic psychological need satisfaction, whereas basic psychological need satisfaction was more strongly associated with learning engagement. The direct association between GAI use and learning engagement was not statistically significant, while the statistical indirect association through basic psychological need satisfaction was significant but small. The fsQCA results showed that high GAI use was not a necessary condition for high learning engagement. The configuration combining autonomy, competence, and relatedness need satisfaction had the highest coverage and showed relatively stable results across threshold adjustments, with competence need satisfaction as a core condition. These findings suggest that the educational relevance of GAI use may be better understood in relation to students' psychological need conditions than to use frequency alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.